Zoophilia, Zoophilia

A person who practices zoophilia is known as a zoophile . "Zoophilia," Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2009; accessed January 24, 2009.

They have no implicit connection to, nor motive in common with zoophilia. http://www.villagevoice.com/people/0137,taormino,28014,24.html Leather Puppy Love Similar views are given on the disclaimers to other animal roleplay sites http://www.leatherdog.com leatherdog.com They are instead more usually associated with BDSM.

It may also be touched upon by sociology which looks both at zoosadism in examining patterns and issues related to abuse and at non-sexual zoophilia in examining the role of animals as emotional support and companionship in human lives, and may fall within the scope of psychiatry if it becomes necessary to consider its significance in a clinical context, or criminology as in most countries it is a crime, and it can be a precursor of other sexual crimes.

Miletski, H. "Zoophilia -- Implications for Therapy," JSET , 26, 85-86.

Sakura Sakurada is an AV idol known to have appeared in animal pornography, specifically in the AV The Dog Game in 2006. While primarily underground, there are a number of animal pornography actresses who specialize in bestiality movies. A box-office success of the 1980s, 24 Horas de Sexo Explcito featured zoophilia.

Beetz 2002, section 5.2.8 Some people believe that zoophilia degrades people, or is forbidden by God.

Defenders of zoophilia argue that physically injuring animals is neither typical of nor commonplace within zoophilia, and that just as sexual activity with humans can be both harmful and not, so can sexual activity with animals.

In a 1997 article, Piers Beirne, Professor of Criminology at the University of Southern Maine, points out that 'for genuine consent to sexual relations to be present...both participants must be conscious, fully informed and positive in their desires.' http://www.nmanimalcontrol.com/aco_fo/sex_abuse/ Ascione(1993) Children Who Are Cruel to Animals: A Review of Research and Implications for Developmental Psychology , Anthrozoos, 6 (4): 226-247, also cited by Beetz (2002) Miltski believes that "Animals are capable of sexual consent - and even initiation - in their own way." Miltski, 1999, p.50 It is not an uncommon practice for dogs to attempt to copulate with ("hump") the legs of people of both genders. Cauldwell, 1948 & 1968; Queen, 1997 Rosenberger (1968) emphasizes that as far as cunnilingus is concerned, dogs require no training, and even Dekkers (1994) and Menninger (1951) admit that sometimes animals take the initiative and do so impulsively. Beetz 2002, section 5.2.8 Those supporting zoophilia feel animals sometimes even seem to enjoy the sexual attention Blake, 1971, and Greenwood, 1963, both cited in Miletski, 1999 or to initiate it. Dekkers, 1994 Animal owners normally know what their own pets like or do not like. Most people can tell if an animal does not like how it is being petted, because it will move away.

Zoophiles say that taking responsibility for their pet's sexual drive is more accepting of the animal than neutering, which is done more for human convenience than animal welfare. http://www.neutering.org neutering.org Neutering NOT Org Those arguing against zoophilia may say that animals mate instinctively to produce offspring, only having sex for reproduction, hence they are deceived when these activities are performed, but this may be disputed due to research by the Bronx Zoo suggesting that some apes copulate for entertainment.

Source: Wikipedia > Zoophilia