Junk Science Topics

• public health effects
• null hypothesis
• medical views
• bad rap
• valid evidence
• department of agriculture
• medical knowledge
• basic books
• causation
• juries
• technical communication
• fringes
• courtroom
• current state
• galileo
• standpoint
• rhetoric
• conclusions
• point of view

Related Images

Source

Source

del.icio.us Tags

• science
• journalism
• pr
• junkscience
• propaganda
• skepticism
• altering
• thacker
• education
• brainwash
• words
• hoaxes
• junk
• definitions
• reality

Junk Science, Junk Science

More recently, it has been used to criticize research on the harmful environmental or public health effects of corporate activities, and occasionally in response to such criticism. "Junk science" is often counterposed to "sound science", a term used to describe studies that favor the accuser's point of view.

It has become all too common for "experts" or "studies" on the fringes of or even well beyond the outer parameters of mainstream scientific or medical views to be presented to juries as valid evidence from which conclusions may be drawn. The use of such invalid scientific evidence (commonly referred to as "junk science") has resulted in findings of causation which simply cannot be justified or understood from the standpoint of the current state of credible scientific and medical knowledge.

W. (2001). Galileo's revenge: Junk science in the courtroom. New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1991), 191.

Department of Agriculture - a bad rap based on a junk-science belief that it's possible to prove a null hypothesis.' Agin asks the reader to step back from the rhetoric, 'But how things are labeled does not make a science junk science.' In its place, he offers, 'So where is the junk science.

Hass, B., & Kleine, M. (2003, Summer). The rhetoric of junk science. Technical Communication Quarterly, 12(3), 267-284.

Source: Wikipedia > Junk Science